Proposal #925
Passed on 05 May 2025 with 97.0% of the votes for yes.
Yes
97.0%
100.0% without abstain
Veto
0.0%
of votes cast
Ended
05 May 2025
97.05%
of votes cast
2.93%
of votes cast
0.02%
of votes cast
0.00%
of votes cast
This proposal signals the removal of all variants derived from the Picasso bridge from the [Hidden link] system. The affected variants are:
[Hidden link] – 5.2% of [Hidden link] supply, 1070 SOL, ~$165,000
[Hidden link] – 99.8% of [Hidden link] supply, 3968 DOT, ~$18,000
[Hidden link] – 0.48% of [Hidden link] supply 4400 USDT, ~$4,400
This action will render these assets as not depositable within the alloy framework but does not force removal. The goal is to prevent further user attempts at onboarding via this route until the Picasso bridge's status is clarified, at which point these assets may either be re-added to the alloy, or a further governance proposal may be created to restore the alloy's backing.
Actual removal will be carried out by the [Hidden link] if this proposal passes. Governance approval is sought, as the bridge appears to be technically functional for manual relaying via the CLI.
[Hidden link], an initially promising solution for enabling IBC to Solana via a custom AVS, has had concerns raised by the community:
Unresolved user issues: Users report being unable to withdraw funds or interact meaningfully with the network.
Potential abandonment signalled by a lack of presence on [Hidden link], [Hidden link] and [Hidden link].
A [Hidden link] further highlights the community’s concern that Picasso may now be defunct or worse.
Attempts by this proposer to contact Picasso maintainers have been unsuccessful. Continued promotion or integration of its bridge variants into the Osmosis frontend or its canonical asset representations puts users at unnecessary risk, particularly highlighting an inability to respond rapidly in the event of a crisis.
[Hidden link] on Osmosis are constructed to provide a unified and risk-minimized experience for users interacting with bridged tokens. Alloyed Assets aggregate liquidity from multiple sources and offer a single, composable token for use across the ecosystem.
By design, these assets aim to reduce reliance on any single bridge. However, the inclusion of a questionable or unreliable bridge undermines the foundation of Alloyed Assets' intended resilience.
Security exposure: An unmaintained or compromised bridge presents an obvious attack vector.
User confusion: Presence in canonical asset pools implies functionality and active support.
Brand and reputational damage: Osmosis is seen as endorsing these assets when they are included in primary withdrawal/deposit paths and alloyed representations.
Forum Post: [Hidden link]