Proposal #1005
Failed on 17 Feb 2026: Limiter already exists for denom: factory/osmo1z0qrq605sjgcqpylfl4aa6s90x738j7m58wyatt0tdzflg2ha26q67k743/wbtc, label: WBTC Static: execute wasm contract failed.
Yes
84.6%
100.0% without abstain
Veto
0.0%
of votes cast
Ended
17 Feb 2026
84.64%
of votes cast
15.34%
of votes cast
0.01%
of votes cast
0.00%
of votes cast
This proposal would increase the maximum allocation cap per WBTC variant within the Alloyed BTC asset to 75%.
The change is intended to allow variants of WBTC to be more readily exchanged within the Alloy, as they have consistently been close to the limit since the previous reduction, resulting in the Alloy being less liquid for intra-alloy swaps, particularly when withdrawing one WBTC variant in exchange for another.
WBTC variant caps were lowered in [Hidden link] to reduce exposure to WBTC within the Alloy, which led to routing issues through the Alloy, prompting a partial reversion of that reduction in [Hidden link].
Eureka-based variants have seen increasing adoption and stable usage patterns across all alloys, with variant caps recently increased for ETH and USDT in [Hidden link]. However, the current caps limit the Alloy’s ability to reflect user preferences, increasing friction during use.
| Variant | Current Usage | Current Cap | Proposed Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Hidden link] | 45% | 50% | 75% |
| [Hidden link] | 48% | 50% | 75% |
| [Hidden link] | 6% | 10% | 75% |
| Total WBTC limit | 99% | 100% (110%) | 100% (225%) |
Details on current liquidity, composition, and cap levels can be found on the [Hidden link]
Forum Post: [Hidden link]