Proposal #917
Passed on 15 May 2024 with 91.9% of the votes for yes.
Yes
91.9%
99.7% without abstain
Veto
0.0%
of votes cast
Ended
15 May 2024
Asked
80.0K
ATOM · 0.7% of the pool
91.94%
of votes cast
7.77%
of votes cast
0.26%
of votes cast
0.03%
of votes cast
This proposal is a corrected version of prop #916. This updated prop corrects a tooling error - no "prop_type" set on #916. Please ignore previous proposal.
Please find the detailed proposal forum post here: [Hidden link]
As seen in its rich history, the Cosmos Hub, which birthed and bootstrapped the most open source and decentralized developer community seen thus far in the web3 industry, has one of the most active and robust governance mechanisms and participants. In a similar vein, Public Goods funding has also always been of crucial importance to the Hub’s stakeholders.
To further this mission, Dora Factory and Atom Accelerator DAO hope to run 10 Quadratic Funding (QF) rounds over the next 24 months, with a total prize pool of 100,000 ATOMs. This will equate to a prize pool of approximately 10,000 ATOMs each round, to fund public goods and developer teams bringing value to the Atom Economic Zone. These public goods will be of utmost importance as the AEZ enters its parabolic growth phase with the upcoming ICS 2.0 (Partial Set Security).
Dora Factory has run 20+ ecosystem QF rounds in the past four years, including the first-ever AEZ round, which garnered $10k in community contributions, which were matched with $60k from the prize pool.
Dora now turns to the Cosmos Hub community treasury, to formally introduce this program to the community, and scale this initiative to a meaningful size.
The following items summarize the voting options and their significance for this proposal:
YES - You agree that the Cosmos Hub community should support the expansion of the AEZ Quadratic Funding program, and contribute 80,000 ATOM to the overall developer matching pool.
NO - You do not agree with the expansion of the AEZ Quadratic Funding program, or do not believe the Cosmos Hub treasury should support this effort .
NO WITH VETO - You consider this proposal (1) to be spam, i.e., irrelevant to Cosmos Hub, (2) disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or (3) violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently set out by Cosmos Hub governance. If the number of ‘NoWithVeto’ votes is greater than a third of total votes, the proposal is rejected and the deposits are burned.
ABSTAIN - You wish to contribute to quorum but you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.