Proposal #507
100.0% of the decisive votes say yes, with turnout at 50.5% of the 33.4% quorum. If voting closed now it would pass. The largest voter, Stakin by The Tie, says yes with 3.8% of the power.
Turnout
50.5%
quorum 33.4%
Yes
100.0%
100.0% without abstain
Ends in
20m
03 Nov 2026
100.00%
50.45% of all power
0.00%
0.00% of all power
0.00%
0.00% of all power
0.00%
0.00% of all power
Reached: 33.4% of the voting power had to vote.
Yes needs over 66.7% of the votes that aren't abstain.
Veto at 33.4% or more rejects it and burns the deposit.
This proposal sets the x/gov parameter proposal_cancel_ratio from 0.5 to 1.0. All other governance parameters remain unchanged.
Currently, a proposer can cancel their own proposal during the voting period and recover half of the deposit. An attacker can exploit this by cancelling a proposal when it is heading toward a NoWithVeto outcome, avoiding the full deposit burn that a veto would trigger. Raising the ratio to 1.0 removes this incentive, because cancelling would then forfeit the entire deposit.
A proposer who believes their proposal is incorrect should not cancel it. Instead, they should ask voters to vote No, which returns the deposit.
Validators and delegator accounts, counted one vote each.
20 of 42 validators voted, 100% yes. 29 delegator accounts voted on their own, 100% yes.
Each validator's vote, by voting power.
20 validators voted, together 50.4% of the voting power.
